Skip to main content

Attributional Theory

 " I deserve what happens to me now" - Edward Scissorhands

Blog Post #6



Attributional Theory

The theory we covered this past week in class relates to outcomes. More specifically, why certain outcomes happen to us and to what we attribute them. Attributional theory is built upon three blocks locusts of control, controllability, and stability. I will dive into them in the later sections, but it is important to restate the goal of our main character. Edwards's central goal, which we discuss every week, is to attempt to become integrated into the suburban society he has been thrust into. Watching the movie again, it is a bit difficult to state with total certainty how Edward is contextualizing the events around him concerning attributional theory because he is not a very vocal lead character, yet, using his overall demeanor, I will do my best.

Locusts of Control

This part of attributional theory can be described through the lens of internal and external. If a locus of control is internal, it comes from within a person, but if it's external, it is a situation coming from an outer source. In the film, Edward views his artistic abilities as internal but task difficulty as external. This results in a shift in effort later in the film when the relationship between him and the townspeople starts going south.

Controllability

This section is self-explanatory in that controllability is defined as whether one feels an outcome is controllable or uncontrollable. At the start of the film, Edward feels that the townspeople's emotions are controllable when his actions directly relate to positive outcomes. However, when his actions don't change, but his luck turns for the worse, and he understands he cannot control his luck from the beginning, he shifts his perception into thinking that their emotions are actually uncontrollable. Furthermore, as previously stated, this causes a drop in a controllable factor, effort. This is seen when he runs away.


Stability

The last section is defined by whether something is changing or unchanging. A person's luck is changing and thus not stable. In the film, I believe that what caused Edward to give up was that he realized his ability and effort were stable and unlikely to get any better but the power of the changing variables were stronger. This then caused helplessness within him and altered his goals and motivation right up until the end of the film.




Comments

  1. Jeannine TurnerOctober 16, 2022 at 10:28 AM

    You did a nice job of explaining the components of Attribution theory. Just make sure you use "locus of control" and not "locusts of control"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY, PERFORMANCE GOALS, AND INSTRUMENTALITY

“Edward, I think you should just come home with me.” – Peg Blog Post #3 This week the class moved on to expectancy-value theory. At its most simple expectancy-value theory states that an individual's motivation can be summed by whether they feel capable of fulfilling a task and if they give importance to the task. Yet, an explanation of instrumentality is also required to understand Edward Scissorhands and his relation to the theory. This term signifies that people feel motivated to do things that will get them closer to their goals. While there are two types of instrumentality, I will focus on the one in which people feel the action is directly related to the procurement of the goal, given it is the only one we see in the actions of the film's main character.  The last definition is performance goals, and these are goals that are related to outcomes outside of oneself as opposed to mastery goals that just focus on internal skill building. Now to connect the theoretical our sci...
1 comment
Read more

Applying the Cognitive Evaluation Theory

 “People are scared of things that are different.” – Edward Scissorhands Blog Post #2 Cognitive Evaluation Theory  Today I will be covering how CET applies to Edward Scissorhands. However, before I apply the theory to the actions of the main character in the film, I have to explain what the theory states. CET is a sub-theory inside the broader Self-Determination Theory and focuses on external and internal motivation. Furthermore, it describes what requirements must be met for someone to become intrinsically motivated, which is more effective in pushing an individual to achieve a task. The three aspects that a person must feel to illicit internal motivation are Autonomy, meaning the belief they control their own actions, competence, meaning they feel they have the capability to achieve their task, lastly relatedness, meaning they feel that they have a group in their environment supporting them and their actions will strengthen their connection to them. Relatedness While related...
1 comment
Read more